Why is the News-Democrat still hassling Rick Stone? That’s old news and water under the bridge. What you never said or asked about is who handed subpoenas to Stone and looked to see if he was licensed in the first place.
My question is: Who is the News-Democrat hiding or protecting? Why is the person who handles the subpoenas and gives them to the process server not being brought out? Rick Stone could not and would not have these subpoenas in the first place if this person had not given them to him. This person did not do his job and check to see if Stone was licensed but no one says a word about him. Isn’t that strange?
If you can’t do the whole story, shut up about it and get off Stone’s back. After all, he’s only half the story.